Difference between revisions of "Comparison-IOTA"
From Obyte Wiki
m (fixed table) |
(updated name) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | This article is a comparison of | + | This article is a comparison of Obyte and IOTA. |
| − | == | + | == Obyte == |
| − | * First cryptocurrency with DAG | + | * First cryptocurrency with DAG structure to trade on exchanges, 2016 late December. |
* Does not require proof-of-work | * Does not require proof-of-work | ||
* Decentralized, not fully trustless. Has 12 witnesses, trust required that majority will not conspire together, users select and can replace witnesses see Witness | * Decentralized, not fully trustless. Has 12 witnesses, trust required that majority will not conspire together, users select and can replace witnesses see Witness | ||
* Fair, open initial distribution by proving BTC ownership, spanning a year | * Fair, open initial distribution by proving BTC ownership, spanning a year | ||
| − | * Has fee, the amount of data to store in the network is the amount of currency, bytes, to pay. To store a transactions costs about 520 bytes, full nodes and witnesses | + | * Has fee, the amount of data to store in the network is the amount of currency, bytes, to pay. To store a transactions costs about 520 bytes, full nodes and witnesses collect/split the fee. |
* To pay for goods/service of value 52 000 bytes, the fee would be 1%. Bytes are traded in 1 000 000 000 (1GB) as of (June 2017), total supply is 1 000 000 000 000 000 or <em>1 petabyte</em>. For todays price of $700 for 1GB, the fee of 600bytes (high estimate) is $0.0004. For fee to be $0.4, the price of 1GB would be $700 000. | * To pay for goods/service of value 52 000 bytes, the fee would be 1%. Bytes are traded in 1 000 000 000 (1GB) as of (June 2017), total supply is 1 000 000 000 000 000 or <em>1 petabyte</em>. For todays price of $700 for 1GB, the fee of 600bytes (high estimate) is $0.0004. For fee to be $0.4, the price of 1GB would be $700 000. | ||
* Declarative smart contracts, oracles, user-defined (private) assets, immutable data-storage. | * Declarative smart contracts, oracles, user-defined (private) assets, immutable data-storage. | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! | + | ! Obyte !! IOTA |
|- | |- | ||
| The ordering of transactions is based on main chain || IOTA uses PoW | | The ordering of transactions is based on main chain || IOTA uses PoW | ||
Latest revision as of 17:20, 20 January 2019
This article is a comparison of Obyte and IOTA.
Obyte
- First cryptocurrency with DAG structure to trade on exchanges, 2016 late December.
- Does not require proof-of-work
- Decentralized, not fully trustless. Has 12 witnesses, trust required that majority will not conspire together, users select and can replace witnesses see Witness
- Fair, open initial distribution by proving BTC ownership, spanning a year
- Has fee, the amount of data to store in the network is the amount of currency, bytes, to pay. To store a transactions costs about 520 bytes, full nodes and witnesses collect/split the fee.
- To pay for goods/service of value 52 000 bytes, the fee would be 1%. Bytes are traded in 1 000 000 000 (1GB) as of (June 2017), total supply is 1 000 000 000 000 000 or 1 petabyte. For todays price of $700 for 1GB, the fee of 600bytes (high estimate) is $0.0004. For fee to be $0.4, the price of 1GB would be $700 000.
- Declarative smart contracts, oracles, user-defined (private) assets, immutable data-storage.
- Community effort, no organized businesses, foundations.
- Uncensored, unmoderated communication channels.
IOTA
- Began as idea/ICO in 2015, trades on exchange 2017 July.
- Requires Proof-of-Work
- Zero-fee, the transaction is payed for by expending compute-resources doing Proof-of-Work.
- The data-structure DAG also sometimes called Tangle
- Total supply is 2 779 530 283 277 761, traded in (1 000 000, 1Mi). 2.779 petaiota.
- ICO, over-the-counter trade before exchange.
- Developer releases mark milestones as checkpoints in network.
- Has foundation, which has wide business connections and signed partnerships.
- Censored/moderated communication channels.
- Not yet (2017 July) decentralized, has Coordinator/Proof-of-Authority.
Another comparison
By Tony from Altcoin Spekulant Oct 6, 2016 interview:
| Obyte | IOTA |
|---|---|
| The ordering of transactions is based on main chain | IOTA uses PoW |
| There is no chance of orphaning | Parts of the DAG can be orphaned |
| There are deterministic criteria when a transaction becomes final | There are no exact criteria: it is still probabilistic, based on intuition |
| Has multiple assets and smart contracts | Is a single token currency with only plain payments |
| There are assets that are transferred privately | All payments are public |
See also
- https://iota.org/ Website
- https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/6h2jut/have_ethereum_devs_considered_tangle_dag_instead Tech discussion
- https://www.reddit.com/r/Iota/comments/6h3sc8/what_are_the_cons_of_iota Tech discussion
- https://multicoin.capital/2018/01/23/iota-miota-analysis Analysis from Multicoin
- https://medium.com/@thedrbits/why-i-also-find-iota-deeply-alarming-99d4f2da3282 Medium article
- https://shitcoin.com/iota-cannot-be-used-for-iot-loss-of-funds-may-occur-e45b1ed9dd6b Technical review 2018-02-09
- https://medium.com/@kaykurokawa/iota-doesnt-scale-fff54f56e975 Technical review 2018-02-09
- https://crypto.bi/tape/blog/iota-collisions IOTA hash collisions could have wrecked the network if it were decentralized
- https://medium.com/@noahruderman/a-summary-of-why-iotas-refutation-of-a-vulnerability-by-dci-labs-is-absurd-128e894781b1 2018-03-04 article
